Which city really has more restaurants per capita?


Travel to most of the city's websites on the web and you will be surprised at how many claim to have more restaurants per capita than anywhere else. This is claimed by San Francisco; Madison, Wisconsin; Washington DC; and Shreveport, Louisiana. At least Canadian cities have the same claim.

So, which cities have a legitimate claim of the title "Most restaurants per capita"? The National Restaurant Association (NRA) publishes a list of restaurants per capita by state. According to the Association, California has, by far, most restaurants with an astounding 87,225 food establishments. The state of New York enters a miserable 58.027. The first five are completed with Texas (53,631), Florida (41,901) Pennsylvania (31,466).

In terms of per capita by state, Washington DC tops the list according to NRA. The region of the capital of the United States drives about 0.4 restaurants per 100 people. The second is, surprisingly, Montana in .354 restaurants per 100 people. They complete the top five of the Rhode Island NRA (0.304 percent) Vermont (.303 percent) New York (.301 percent). If you are a little hungry, you may want to avoid all three states with the least amount of Mississippi, Kentucky and Utah restaurants.

In terms of cities in North America, it is a little more difficult to determine who can claim the city title with most restaurants per capita.

Here are ten cities with more than 100,000 people who have made the claim. But who has the real claim? Who offers more options to the kitchen seeker or simply to the hungry buyer? Who can claim the title of The Restaurant City?

The city of San Francisco is a city of 744,230 people and claims to have 2,662 restaurants within the city limits. There is no doubt that the standard of restaurants in the city of the bay is exceptional. If you only include San Francisco correctly, its density is 279 people per restaurant. But because housing costs the number of people living in the city proper has decreased while the number of businesses, including restaurants, San Francisco is a distorted number. If the metropolitan area counts, the number of restaurants increases to 4,300 restaurants (we will not include hundreds more in the nearby wine country of Napa and Sonoma). If you consider the population of the metropolitan area of ​​7,168,176 and divide by 4,300, you get a per capita density of 1,667 people per restaurant.

Winnipeg is a city on the edge of Canadian prairies that has a wide cross section of immigrant communities, all of which have their local ethnic cuisine. If you want French toast for breakfast, perogies and sauerkraut for lunch, and Imperial Vietnamese rolls for dinner, this is the place to come. This city regularly claims to have more restaurants per capita than any other city. Some websites claim that the city has 900 restaurants, but in reality there are only 478. With a population of 619,544, Winnipeg can claim only one restaurant for every 1,296 snow-covered Canadians.

Victory. This city on Vancouver Island and the capital of British Columbia, Canada, regularly makes the claim that it has the "second largest number of restaurants per capita," which is perhaps an intelligent psychology, since the city has never accused Which is the best. With a population of 335,000 inhabitants, the city claims to have 265 Italian, French, Greek, East Indian, Vegetarian, German, Dutch, Mexican, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese and Thai restaurants. That means Victoria has a restaurant for every 1,264 people. But with its spectacular location halfway between Vancouver and Seattle, you would hardly care if your claim is a bit out of place.

In New York City, nobody cooks at home and by the time you have heard of a restaurant, it probably closed. Restaurants open and close with alarming speed in the Big Apple. On average, New York City can claim 6,650 places to eat, from the elegant Lespinasse to the greasiest restaurant on the corner, most restaurants anywhere on the continent. However, with 8,168,338 people, New York can only claim to have 1,228 people per restaurant. It may seem that every second building in New York is a restaurant, but they have to serve many residents staying vertically. That explains why it is difficult to find a table some nights.

The only Canadian city that can claim the most restaurants per capita is Montreal, in the province of Quebec. With just over 5,000 restaurants in the metropolitan island area, there seems to be at least one restaurant in every corner. With its diverse immigrant population and the French majority, the city has all kinds of cuisine available, from Lebanese to continental French and native Canadian. Some 3,720,000 Quebecers live in the metropolitan area, which makes Montreal the second largest French-speaking city in the world. Giving you a restaurant number per capita of 744.

When you leave Austin you enter Texas, so says the saying. This funky city in central Texas has 1,088 places to eat to enhance its reputation as Music City USA. That list includes 128 establishments in or around the University of Texas alone. The growing population of Austin is currently 690, 252, which makes its ratio of people to restaurants 634.

Louisville, home of the Kentucky Derby, is a small city of just over half a million people. Pap John & # 39; s Pizza and Yum Brands, the parent company of A&W, KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, make Louisville their corporate home, so it is not surprising that this city on the Ohio River has 1,089 restaurants. That makes 510 people per restaurant.

Madison owns the rights to the title of "city with the most restaurants per capita" and the capital makes the claim in all its literature. However, reducing the actual number of restaurants is quite difficult. The best available list points to 437 restaurants that cater to 221,551 people in the city of Wisconsin. But that generates only 506 people per restaurant. Good for only the third in this list.

Wichita, Kansas is not usually a city that comes to mind when you think about cooking. But with an ethnically diverse workforce, the largest city in Kansas has a reputation for cultural diversity and is located in the barn of America. The 739 restaurants in the city can only accommodate 360, 715 people. That translates into 488 people per restaurant, good for second place on our list.

Dallas This city of Lone Star State has a population of 1,250,950 and a selection of restaurants totaling 2,666. While the city is known for its grills and grills, there is an amazing combination of excellent restaurants, from elegant to basic. That means that every restaurant, fast food place and grill in the third largest city in Texas can boast a potential group of just 469 people. Making this city the winner of the title "City with more restaurants per capita".